The Handmaidens Tale and 1984 Essay Example for Free

The Handmaidens Tale and 1984 EssayThe government has the right-hand(a)eous duties to be a national defense for its citizens, to act as an administration of evaluator in providing law and send for its peoples, and to provide certain state-supported goods and services to its people though in these present epochs, the government fails to provide certain necessities to its citizens. The ii books scripted in a similar century, both George Orwells 1984, and Margret Atwoods The Handmaids Tale, display how the government can use violence as a mover of understand on its people. In 1984, the government controls its citizens lives through manipulating the language of Oceania Syme, who is Winstons colleague at the Ministry of Truth, was a lexicographer who developed the new dictionary of the Oceanic language Newspeak. Also, similar in type, in Margret Atwoods The Handmaids Tale, the government in Gilead uses policies that regulates and controls its womens appetencys for sexual acti vity the government acts in such a way, because the government has a procreative agenda in Gilead.To conclude, the government in both these novels uses violence as a means of unequivocal its citizens. In 1984, and The Handmaids Tale, both the citizens of Oceania and Gilead shake off their language distorted this is in order for them to be infringed from certain goods and services. This language alteration is roughly seeming(a) when Syme informs Winston (the main protagonist in 1984) that by 2050, no individual will be able to understand their communication this meaning that the government of Oceania wants to control its citizens suppositions.This stage setting can be understood when Syme is in a low-ceilinged canteen deep underground, and he refers to the beauty of the governments means of controlling the topical anesthetic vocabulary, saying Dont you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the throw of thought? Has it ever occurred to you, Winston, that by the yea r 2050, at the very latest, not a atomic number 53 human being will be alive who could understand such a conversation as we are having now? The whole climate of thought will be different. In fact, there will be no thought, as we understand it now.Orthodoxy means not thinkingnot needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness (Orwell, pg. 68). This summons elucidates to the openhanded Brothers master plan in narrowing the range of thought to the Newspeak it states that all human beings will not understand the conversation they are having, because the universal lexicon will devalue the purpose of thought. The fact that Syme uses words and phrases such as thought will be different, there will be no thought, and, Orthodoxy means not thinking, implies that the government of Oceania will infringe on the citizens right to the freedom of thought.Not only does the government of Oceania control the public through changing the vocabulary, but this happens also in the government of Gilead. Th is language manipulation is most evident when Offred was walking to the shop, and she noticed the written letters on the shop had been painted out, describing, Almost all written words anywhere have been removed, even the shops have had the lettering painted out, when they decided that even the label of the shops were too much for us. Now places are known by their characteristics alone (Atwood, pg. 1). This quotation refers to how the written words have been removed out of the language, in order for the government to control its citizens from certain services such as literacy. In this quotation, the words and phrases such as all written words anywhere have been removed the lettering painted out, and, places are known by their signs, means that the government has narrowed the language so much, that the citizens can only understand the significant sections of the city, and not have the freedom to explore its vicinities.In this paragraph, it is clear that the government uses the ma nipulation of the local lexicon, subsequently infringing on the rights of its local citizens. In the other novel, 1984 written by George Orwell, the citizens of Oceania experience other form of control, which is the violation to rights of privacy.In this novel, Winston Smith described the conditions in the public square mentioning that if an individual showed any miniscule sign of deceitfulness, then the government would arrest the criminal immediately, saying, It was terribly wicked to let your thoughts wander when you were in any public place or within range of a telescreen. The smallest thing could give you away. A nervous tic, an unconscious look of anxiety, a habit of muttering to yourselfanything that carried with it the suggestion of abnormality, of having something to hide. In any case, to wear an unlawful expression on your face was itself a punishable offence.There was even a word for it in Newspeak facecrime (Orwell, pg. 79). In this quotation, Winston Smith refers t o the Big Brothers legislative policies in which telescreens would be set-up in order to have control over its citizens. From the author using words and phrases such as terribly dangerous to let your thoughts wander when you were in any public place or within range of a telescreen, the smallest thing could give you away, and, improper expression on your face was itself a punishable offence, shows that it is even dangerous to express the slightest sign of abnormality in front of the telescreen.Not only does the government in Oceania mishandle the right to private and public privacy, but that in the government in Gilead the same occurrence ensues. This governmental violation of the right to private and public privacy, is most evident in the gymnasium, where Offred learned who to whisper almost without making a sound, explaining, We learned to whisper almost without sound. In the semi-darkness we could stretch out our arms, when the Aunts werent looking, and touch each(prenominal) ot hers hands across space.We learned to lip-read, our heads flat on the beds, turned sideways, watching each others mouths. In this way we interchanged names, from bed to bed Alma. Janine. Dolores. Moira. June (Atwood pg. 4). In this quotation, the handmaids exchange names through lip reading and through whispers. Through the words and phrases such as, learned to whisper almost without sound, learned to lip-read, and, In this way we exchange names, means that because they had to lip-read and whisper, this shows the reader that the handmaids have no privacy to exchange names.In this paragraph, it is noticeable that the governments legislating and policy mitigates the right to privacy. Furthurmore, in the same novel, 1984, it can be seen that the government subjugates its people from sexual activity. In the novel, Winston fantasizes about making live with Julia as she travels across the field, saying, The girl with dark tomentum was coming towards them across the field. With what seem ed a single movement she tore off her clothes and flung them disdainfully aside.Her body was white and smooth, but it aroused no desire in him, indeed he barely looked at it. What overwhelmed him in that instant was admiration for the gesture with which she had thrown her clothes aside. With its grace and carelessness it seemed to annihilate a whole culture, a whole system of thought, as though Big Brother and the Party and the Thought Police could all be swept into wind by a single splendid movement of the arm. That too was a gesture belonging to the ancient time (Atwood, pg. 0). In this quote, Winston Smith dreams about Julia fetching off her clothes as she runs across the field. Through the author using words and phrases such as, she tore off her clothes, he barely looked at it, and, Big Brother and the Party and the Though Police, shows that as Julia takes off her clothes on the field, Winston Smith barely looks at her body due to the Big Brother and the Parties legislation fo r the elimination of sexual promiscuity.Not only does the government in Oceania take away the right to sexual activity, but that the government of Gilead also infringes on the right to sexual interest. This governmental infringement can also be seen in the Handmaidens tale through Offred who makes it clear that throughout the narrative, she is apart of a collectively have resource. She describes her tattoo as four digits and an eye, a passport in reverse. Its supposed to guarantee that I will never be able to fade, finally, into another landscape. I am too important. I am a national resource. (Atwood 65).This quote said by Offred of her describing her tattoo acts as a type of the tattoo itself that the government subjugates its people from sexual activity that they would desire and that women are only used as a resource to repopulate. In conclusion, the two narratives in which were written in a similar century, both George Orwells 1984, and Margret Atwoods The Handmaids Tale, cle arly use their book as a means of foretelling the future of a society monopolized by corruption from future technology by displaying how their government uses violence as a means of control over its people.