Karma of Violence in Macbeth

Karma of Violence in MacbethWith elements like wars, assassinations, and murders, wildness takes up a important part of Macbeth. At the early stage of Macbeth, the audience is presented a battlefield scene where a spread over massager appears. Echoing such a groundless and bloody image, the play ends with Macbeth being killed. Although karma is an Indian belief, lines like This even-handed justice / Commends the ingredients of our poisoned goblet / to our bear lips (Macbeth I.vii.10) reveal traits of karma in the Scottish play.1Karma means that tot every(prenominal)y exploitions urinate consequences which will affect the doers of the actions at some future time (Reichenbach 399). In this essay, I will argue that madness is not merely actions performed by the characters only the skeleton of plan and theme. For the sake of a clear analysis, I will outset outline the concept of karma and karma of abandon in Macbeth. past I will conclude that the karmic effect of violence drives the development of plot and jobs moral judgement.As suggested by Rajendra Prasad, the law of karma should be viewed as a retributive theory of piety (qtd. in Keown 331). Reichenbach also noted that 1.Morally responsible actions which be done out of desire for their fruits argon subjected to karma 2.Some karmic effects argon manifested at once or in this life, some in the attached life 3.Karmic effect of actions flush toilet be accumulated (qtd. in Keown 335). In this essay, Keowns idea on karma is taken the relationship between karma and intention is indisputable volitional action alone can head in karma violate in ones heart without carnal performance is possible that same act may have opposite karma for unalike people (Keown 336). Rebirth and karma beyond characters portrayed lives will not be discussed here.Violence is not yet a part of the play, but its skeleton. Karma, as stated, is accumulative and is resulted from moral and physical actions. In Macbeth, v iolence, with its karmic effect, breeds violence. In Act one, Macbeth is reported about cutting Macdonwald open, unseames him from the nave to th chops, / and fixes his head upon battlements (I.ii.22-3)and is nothing afeard of what himself didst make, / strange images of decease (I.iii.97-8). This suggests his hazardous record and his capacity of bloody deeds in the future. Such a valiant and worthy consummation (I.ii.24), as a result, won him the title of Thane of Cawdor. It was then the realization of omen bred his ambition whose murder yet is but marvelous (I.iii.139). The word fantastical echoes with Banquos address to the witches I the name of truth, / Are ye fantastical or that indeed / which outwardly ye show?(I.iii.54-5), drawing parallel between the witches and Macbeths fantastical thoughts which are not indeed outwardly he showed as well. With such murderous thoughts, Macbeth, whose place is the near (I.iv.36) to Duncan betrays his own family blood and country to se cure the fecal matter. The karmic effect of this bloody throne is fear the fear on Banquos issue and Macduffs flee to England prompts him further violence and ultimate self-destruction. His bloody acts make returning were as tedious as go over (III.iv.140-1).Violence, therefore, breeds on-and-on violent deeds till the end of the play.As Macbeth puts it, Things rugged begun make strong themselves by ill (III.ii.55), such on-and-on violence increases intensity over time. After violence against Macdonwald, Macbeth killed Duncan in sleep. Sleep, under Shakespeares description, is stark . . . that knits up the reveled sleeve of care . . . the great natures second course, chief nourisher in lifes feast (II.ii.34-8). The peace of mindful description of natures gift and Duncans royal position demarcation line with the murder, highlighting intensified violence. Although he is un desextled by the deed, he before long recovers and exhibits a greater degree of violence. Without consulting his married woman, Macbeth readily kills two innocent servants. Compared to the suspicion shown in Duncans murder, he becomes bolder. Violence, as a recurring role, performs an endless lace. Macbeth, with a mind full of scorpions (III.ii.36), then sends out three men in total only to ensure Banquo and Fleances deaths. He becomes determined to take a step further to kill the weaker gender and innocent children in Macduffs family. When Macduff receives the sad news, he asks about his children repeatedly and all my children?, My children too?, What, all my attractive chickens and their dam / at one fell swoop? (IV.iii.211-8). Such responses reflect that people then perceived the act of killing innocent children as outrageously violent.The climax of on-and-on violence came when Macduff greets the King with Macbeths head, saying Behold, where stands / the usurpers cursed head. (V.viii.54-5), putting an end on the loop of violence in the play.This illustration of the step up loop o f violence suggests karmic consequences of murderous thoughts. In the analysis of Shakespearean violence, Foakes suggests that the advocate to violence is deeply embedded in the human psyche, and creates recurring whatsoever political formations are dominant (Foakes 16). This viewpoint echoes with this karmic loop of violence. The series of violent acts keeps operate the plot development. The karma begins with Macbeths sinning in his heart (Keown 336) with murderous thoughts. Had he stopped at any point of his violent murders, he would not have suffered the deadly karma. Karmic effects of Macbeths repetitive violence, as suggested, accumulated throughout the play, causing the downfall of the soul and self-destruction. The karma of violence, therefore, extends the plot with series of consequences in Macbeth.In Macbeth, karma of violence is not only the consequences of behaviour. It implicitly reflects good morality in violence. Contrasting conventional idea, violence does not nece ssarily imply faulty karma. Traditional Christian belief generally subscribes to the idea of Thou shalt not kill. However, under karma, same act may have different consequences for different people.At the beginning of the play, Duncan ordered the execution of Thane of Cawdor. This act of violence, justified by the traitors treachery, did not result in a lousy karma. Duncan, despite his death, enjoys the peace of mind of which Macbeth is deprived. Although Banquos violent behaviours are not explicitly described, audience can understand that Banquo, as a warrior, is capable of violence. His acts of violence, however, are justified by his selfless patriotism. In the play, Shakespeare uses Banquo as a moral seam against Macbeth. They are of similar background, official rank and power at the beginning of Macbeth they twain face the tempting prophecy. However, Banquo endeavours to keep his bosom franchised and allegiance clear (II.i.26-7) era Macbeth jumps the life to come to commit murders (I.vii.7). The fact that Banquo succeeds in upholding morality in the same temptation suggests that Macbeths tragic ending is not a result of fatalism, but karma out of volitional actions. Karma is hugely based on good consideration and moral accountability. With moral actions, Banquos family line is blessed with good karma, severalise Macbeths violence-induced fatal karma. Macduff, who performed the visually bloodiest violence by cutting and displaying Macbeths head, is also exempted from bad karma.2Since Macbeth has no children of his own, it is unlikely that Macduffs bloody deed would provoke another loop of violence against himself. It is reasonable to suggest that, Macduffs violent action, as a karma on Macbeth, is justified by its good intention of saving Scotland from the tyranny.The above examples of karma contrast against the deadly karma on Macbeth and Lady Macbeth. In Macbeths case, he performs all the violence based on his desire for power and the fear in secu ring it. Accordingly, he is subjected to karmic effects, which mostly take the form of internal struggles. Booth concluded that, all three murders towards Duncan, Banquo and Macduffs family are followed immediately by scenes of suffering and self-tortures (Booth 31). After Duncans murder, all(prenominal) noise appals Macbeth and he hears ominous voices threatening that he could no longstanding sleep with peace (II.ii.56). Although Macbeth does not show explicit guilt aft(prenominal) Banquos death, his sub-conscience tortures him. He is startled by the image of Banquos phantom despite his self-regard as a fearless man. Macbeths soul becomes weary after murdering Macduffs family. He pessimistically believes that his way of life / is falln into the sere, the yellow leaf, / and that which should accompany old age, / as honor, love, obedience, process of friends, / he must not look to have.(V.iii.22-6). Ironically, Macbeth has traded his soul, friends, honour for a fruitless chapite r and a lifeless life. He is caught in a tragedy of his own making. In this way, the karma on Macbeth manifests as his internal struggles. Despite sympathy towards Macbeth, Macbeths selfishness, betrayal and violence deserve his own deadly and violent karma. As suggested by the Bible, For the wages of sin is death (Roman 5 23). Therefore, given his murderous deeds, his death has to be brutally violent for moral justification. Macbeths tragic death implies that Shakespeare has admit the immorality of Macbeths violent deeds.Lady Macbeth, similarly, has to pay a price for effusive her spirit in Macbeths ear, / and chastises with the valour of her tongue (I.v.24-5) Ribner commented thatThe relationship between Macbeth and his wife steadily deteriorates . . . . The force of monstrous severs Macbeth from the rest of humanity it breaks also the chemical bond which ties him to his wife. He lives more and more closely with his own fears into which she cannot intrude . . . . No longer does he confide in her. (Ribner 164)Considering Lady Macbeths admiration to Macbeth and her idolatry to help him get the throne, psychological separation between the couple is unsupportable to Lady Macbeth. It is reasonable to deduce that this psychological separation may formulate her mental breakdown and loss of masculinity displayed before. The fact that the seemingly evil Lady Macbeth is also subjected to karmic condemnation from her own conscience may signifies her humanness, but more importantly, the deadly karma is to impose moral judgement on her behaviours.Karma of a particular behaviour reflects its moral nature and judgement. In Macbeth, not all violent deeds result in bad karma. Considering the play is set in a political disturbed period in which Scotland was first traumatized by traitors and then Macbeth the Tyrant, violence, to a certain extent, was a norm in that era. The fact that Scotland restores her order through violence against Macbeth suggests that some violence is morally right. These characters who perform violence for morally right reasons can be exempted from bad karma. Karma, in Buddhist belief, is controlled by a Supreme Being. Shakespeare, as a Supreme Being of this play, reflects judgements towards the characters behaviours with different karmas resulted. Karma on violence, therefore, gives the audience some ideas on the morality of violence.Violence is the linking element that drives plot development. It is through the recurring nature of karma that violence in Macbeth trammels up the consequence (I.vii.3) of Macbeths self-destruction. By designing different karmic effects, Shakespeare explores the good and evil of violence. Although sympathy towards human flaws may be valued, it is infallible to have deadly karma for ill-intended murders committed. Violence, therefore, is not merely a part of the plot. It is the driving force of the plot and a subtle exploration on morality of violence.